> ... produce more accurate results in some difficult cases.

   c=: p. <20$1.5
   c
3325.26 _44336.8 280799 _1.1232e6 3.18239e6 _6.78911e6 1.13152e7 _1.50869e7
1.63441e7 _1.45281e7 1.0654e7 _6.45695e6 3.22847e6 _1.3245e6 441501 _117734
24527.8 _3847.5 427.5 _30 1
   p. c
┌─┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│1│3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2 3r2
3r2 3r2│
└─┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘



On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Roger Hui <[email protected]>wrote:

> You may or may not know that p. employs some extraordinary measures which
> produce more accurate results in some difficult cases.   But those
> extraordinary measures are not "cool".  For example:
>
>    w=: p. <1+i.20   NB. Wilkinson's 
> polynomial<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilkinson_polynomial>
>    w
> 2432902008176640000 _8752948036761600000 13803759753640704000
> _12870931245150988800 8037811822645051776 _3599979517947607200
> 1206647803780373360 _311333643161390640 63030812099294896
> _10142299865511450 1307535010540395 _135585182899530 11310276995381 _7561...
>
>    p. w
> ┌─┬──────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
> │1│20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1│
> └─┴──────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> None of these cute ways is very accurate in tough cases:
>>
>> 0j15 ": (2*a) %~ (-b) (+,-) %: (b^2) - 4*a*c [ 'a b c' =. 1e_6 1e6 1e_6
>> 0.000000000000000 _1000000000000.000000000000000
>>
>> But p. does better:
>>
>>    0j15 ": 1 {:: p. c,b,a
>> _1000000000000.000000000000000 _0.000000000001000
>>
>> Henry Rich
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/11/2012 6:29 PM, Roger Hui wrote:
>>
>>> There are some cheeky (or is it cheesy?) versions:
>>>
>>> (2*a) %~ (-b) (+,-) %: (b^2) - 4*a*c  NB. Kip Murray
>>> (2*a) %~ - b (+,-) %: (b^2) - 4*a*c
>>> (+:a) %~ - b (+,-) %: (*:b) - 4*a*c
>>> -: a %~ - b (+,-) %: (*:b) - 4*a*c
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:37 AM, km <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  It appears this could be translated into J as the rather cool
>>>>
>>>> (2*a) %~ (-b) (+,-) %: (b^2) - 4*a*c
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 11, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Roger Hui <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Example from the Iverson and McDonnell *Phrasal
>>>>> Forms*<http://www.jsoftware.**com/papers/fork.htm<http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/fork.htm>>paper
>>>>> (which
>>>>> introduced fork):
>>>>>
>>>>> (-b)(+,-)√((b*2)-4×a×c)÷2×a
>>>>>
>>>>> √ is a postulated APL primitive, spelled %: in J.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:49 AM, km <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  What is the coolest way of programming the quadratic formula in J?  We
>>>>>>
>>>>> are
>>>>
>>>>> finding the roots of polynomial c + x*(b + x*a) without using p. .  I
>>>>>>
>>>>> offer
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>     roots
>>>>>> 3 : 0
>>>>>> 'a b c' =. y
>>>>>> q =. %: (b^2) - 4*a*c
>>>>>> (2*a) %~ (-b) + q,-q
>>>>>> )
>>>>>>     roots 1 3 2
>>>>>> _1 _2
>>>>>>     roots 1 0 1
>>>>>> 0j1 0j_1
>>>>>>     roots 1 _2 1
>>>>>> 1 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> partly as problem definition.  I am looking for cool roots verbs!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kip Murray
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/**
>>>>>> forums.htm <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>>> ----------
>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/**
>>>>> forums.htm <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>>> ----------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/**
>>>> forums.htm <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>>>
>>>>  ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>> ----------
>>> For information about J forums see 
>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/**forums.htm<http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>> ----------
>> For information about J forums see 
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/**forums.htm<http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
>>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to