I agree it would be nice. If I understand correctly, the proposed
definition would allow the following replacement:
( ({. , #)/.~ ) becomes ( (, #)/.~ )
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have often wished for that.
>
> --
> Raul
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Roger Hui <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I have a question concerning your use of *key*. Do you find yourself
> > wishing that in x f/.y, the f would be invoked with a left argument which
> > is key value corresponding to the items in the right argument? This does
> > not mean that the J definition or implementation will be changed, but to
> > find out that if I have an opportunity to define/implement key in another
> > context ;-) whether I should consider changing it.
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
