It'd be a good exercise for somebody. The main work would be in the code to "recognize" special cases of f@]/.. rather than f/. The code is in file ao.c .
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Jose Mario Quintana < [email protected]> wrote: > " > This does not mean that the J definition or implementation will be changed > " > > Why not? I would not like to be left behind :) Compatibility? It could > be added as (/..). > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Roger Hui <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > I have a question concerning your use of *key*. Do you find yourself > > wishing that in x f/.y, the f would be invoked with a left argument which > > is key value corresponding to the items in the right argument? This does > > not mean that the J definition or implementation will be changed, but to > > find out that if I have an opportunity to define/implement key in another > > context ;-) whether I should consider changing it. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
