"
This does not mean that the J definition or implementation will be changed
"

Why not?  I would not like to be left behind :)  Compatibility?  It could
be added as (/..).



On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Roger Hui <[email protected]>wrote:

> I have a question concerning your use of *key*.  Do you find yourself
> wishing that in x f/.y, the f would be invoked with a left argument which
> is key value corresponding to the items in the right argument?  This does
> not mean that the J definition or implementation will be changed, but to
> find out that if I have an opportunity to define/implement key in another
> context ;-) whether I should consider changing it.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to