The lablist.txt was first introduced for jgtk. I guess it can simplify the logic of discovering labs.
BTW for labs, it also needs to update the Public repository which is the real source. Otherwise your changes to Addons will be overwritten. Пт, 20 сен 2013, Ian Clark писал(а): > Thanks Bill, I went ahead and did it, just after sending my email. > (Revisions 4626 and 4627) > > Really quite easy (...and I've made myself a new checklist). > > Never really understood the need for lablist.txt. j602 doesn't need it. Is > it there just to control migration of labs from j602 to j801? (What part of > jwiki/pipermail should I read?) > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:46 AM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I guess that would be trivial, just use the "svn commit" command > > if you are using the command line interface. > > > > Пт, 20 сен 2013, Ian Clark писал(а): > > > I'm being lazy, Bill :) > > > > > > I work strictly from checklists when using svn. I don't have one for > > > updating lablist.txt (yet). I guess it's just a question of hunting for > > it. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:49 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I can that you can commit changes to svn, can you explain why you > > cannot > > > > change the lablist.txt? > > > > > > > > On 19 Sep, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's okay Bill, I've located the one verb I've used in misc.ijs and > > > > copied > > > > > it into tte.ijs. > > > > > > > > > > It works fine now in JQt. > > > > > > > > > > But to run: tte.ijs -needs this line inserting in lablist.txt: > > > > > Debug;Explicate a given tacit verb;~addons/debug/tte/tte.ijt > > > > > > > > > > open '~addons/labs/labs/lablist.txt' NB. -to do the hand-edit > > > > > > > > > > but I don't know how to fix lablist.txt via svn. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:33 AM, bill lam <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Try load the specific script inside the specific misc folder > > > > >> > > > > >> require '~addons/.../misc/....ijs' > > > > >> > > > > >> On 19 Sep, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Further to this, I've uploaded a new addon: 'debug/tte' > > > > >>> > > > > >>> used like this: > > > > >>> require 'debug/tte' > > > > >>> mytacitverb tte > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Studio > Labs --shows a new lab under Category: Debug: > > > > >>> Explicate (convert to explicit) a given tacit verb > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Or you can get some rough'n'ready documentation with: > > > > >>> ABOUT_tte_ > > > > >>> > > > > >>> At present it only works under j602. When I try it under j64-801 it > > > > fails > > > > >>> because: > > > > >>> require 'misc' > > > > >>> is no longer supported, giving the error: not found: > > > > >>> /Applications/j64-801/bin/misc > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Joe Bogner <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> Thanks Ian. trace looks helpful too. I hadn't stumbled upon that > > yet. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected] > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> Joe Bogner asks: > > > > >>>>> " Is there a utility to generate an explicit definition from a > > tacit > > > > >>>>> definition?" > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> There've certainly been attempts at one. There hasn't been any > > > > >> published > > > > >>>>> improvement on this one by Zsban Ambrus: > > > > >>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Scripts/TacitToExplicit > > > > >>>>> ...though I've had an add-on on the stocks, waiting to get > > properly > > > > >>>> tested > > > > >>>>> for almost a year now. (Sorry... it was low priority.) > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> I also wrote a "roadmap" a year ago to pull together all the > > relevant > > > > >>>> stuff > > > > >>>>> on jwiki... > > > > >>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Guides/Tacit_to_explicit_roadmap > > > > >>>>> ...but I notice I didn't finish it (it needs to mention Ambrus's > > > > "tte", > > > > >>>> and > > > > >>>>> it's incomplete in "Approach #2"). > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Joe Bogner <[email protected] > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I'm learning the evaluation rules for tacit expressions, since > > that > > > > is > > > > >>>>>> what's commonly posted as solutions. Is there a utility to > > generate > > > > an > > > > >>>>>> explicit definition from a tacit definition? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> For example, to generate a tacit expression from explicit > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> 13 : '(+/ y) % # y' > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> +/ % # > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Is there some routine to expand that out? (I've now learned that > > > > its a > > > > >>>>>> fork). It seems possible that it could expand out to multiple > > > > >> possible > > > > >>>>>> variants -- since as I understand, it's a reduced form. I've > > looked > > > > at > > > > >>>>>> fndisplay but didn't put too much time into it yet since I > > wasn't > > > > sure > > > > >>>>> that > > > > >>>>>> it's what I was looking for. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Along those same lines, j6 shows a representation of an > > expression > > > > in > > > > >>>>> boxes > > > > >>>>>> which I've found to be helpful to understand how an expression > > is > > > > >>>>> grouped. > > > > >>>>>> I haven't seen that same functionality in j7 or j8. Does it > > exist? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I find myself spending a fair amount of time taking an > > expression > > > > and > > > > >>>>> then > > > > >>>>>> looking up its parts in the Vocabulary to understand what its > > doing. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>>>>> For information about J forums see > > > > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>>>> For information about J forums see > > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>>> For information about J forums see > > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>> For information about J forums see > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >> For information about J forums see > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > >> > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > For information about J forums see > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > -- > > regards, > > ==================================================== > > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 > > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
