Okay, it wasn't quite as simple as I first thought.

I'll make some time to fully understand what Bill is saying.


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:23 AM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:

> The lablist.txt was first introduced for jgtk.  I guess it can
> simplify the logic of discovering labs.
>
> BTW for labs, it also needs to update the Public repository
> which is the real source. Otherwise your changes to Addons will be
> overwritten.
>
> Пт, 20 сен 2013, Ian Clark писал(а):
> > Thanks Bill, I went ahead and did it, just after sending my email.
> > (Revisions 4626 and 4627)
> >
> > Really quite easy (...and I've made myself a new checklist).
> >
> > Never really understood the need for lablist.txt. j602 doesn't need it.
> Is
> > it there just to control migration of labs from j602 to j801? (What part
> of
> > jwiki/pipermail should I read?)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:46 AM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I guess that would be trivial, just use the "svn commit" command
> > > if you are using the command line interface.
> > >
> > > Пт, 20 сен 2013, Ian Clark писал(а):
> > > > I'm being lazy, Bill :)
> > > >
> > > > I work strictly from checklists when using svn. I don't have one for
> > > > updating lablist.txt (yet). I guess it's just a question of hunting
> for
> > > it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:49 PM, bill lam <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I can that you can commit changes to svn, can you explain why you
> > > cannot
> > > > > change the lablist.txt?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 19 Sep, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It's okay Bill, I've located the one verb I've used in misc.ijs
> and
> > > > > copied
> > > > > > it into tte.ijs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It works fine now in JQt.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But to run: tte.ijs -needs this line inserting in lablist.txt:
> > > > > > Debug;Explicate a given tacit verb;~addons/debug/tte/tte.ijt
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   open '~addons/labs/labs/lablist.txt'   NB. -to do the hand-edit
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but I don't know how to fix lablist.txt via svn.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:33 AM, bill lam <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Try load the specific script inside the specific misc folder
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> require '~addons/.../misc/....ijs'
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On 19 Sep, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Further to this, I've uploaded a new addon: 'debug/tte'
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> used like this:
> > > > > >>>  require 'debug/tte'
> > > > > >>>  mytacitverb tte
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Studio > Labs --shows a new lab under Category: Debug:
> > > > > >>>    Explicate (convert to explicit) a given tacit verb
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Or you can get some rough'n'ready documentation with:
> > > > > >>>  ABOUT_tte_
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> At present it only works under j602. When I try it under
> j64-801 it
> > > > > fails
> > > > > >>> because:
> > > > > >>>  require 'misc'
> > > > > >>> is no longer supported, giving the error: not found:
> > > > > >>> /Applications/j64-801/bin/misc
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Joe Bogner <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> Thanks Ian. trace looks helpful too. I hadn't stumbled upon
> that
> > > yet.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Ian Clark <
> [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Joe Bogner asks:
> > > > > >>>>> " Is there a utility to generate an explicit definition from
> a
> > > tacit
> > > > > >>>>> definition?"
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> There've certainly been attempts at one. There hasn't been
> any
> > > > > >> published
> > > > > >>>>> improvement on this one by Zsban Ambrus:
> > > > > >>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Scripts/TacitToExplicit
> > > > > >>>>> ...though I've had an add-on on the stocks, waiting to get
> > > properly
> > > > > >>>> tested
> > > > > >>>>> for almost a year now. (Sorry... it was low priority.)
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> I also wrote a "roadmap" a year ago to pull together all the
> > > relevant
> > > > > >>>> stuff
> > > > > >>>>> on jwiki...
> > > > > >>>>>
> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Guides/Tacit_to_explicit_roadmap
> > > > > >>>>> ...but I notice I didn't finish it (it needs to mention
> Ambrus's
> > > > > "tte",
> > > > > >>>> and
> > > > > >>>>> it's incomplete in "Approach #2").
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Joe Bogner <
> [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> I'm learning the evaluation rules for tacit expressions,
> since
> > > that
> > > > > is
> > > > > >>>>>> what's commonly posted as solutions. Is there a utility to
> > > generate
> > > > > an
> > > > > >>>>>> explicit definition from a tacit definition?
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> For example, to generate a tacit expression from explicit
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> 13 : '(+/ y) % # y'
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> +/ % #
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Is there some routine to expand that out? (I've now learned
> that
> > > > > its a
> > > > > >>>>>> fork).  It seems possible that it could expand out to
> multiple
> > > > > >> possible
> > > > > >>>>>> variants -- since as I understand, it's a reduced form. I've
> > > looked
> > > > > at
> > > > > >>>>>> fndisplay but didn't put too much time into it yet since I
> > > wasn't
> > > > > sure
> > > > > >>>>> that
> > > > > >>>>>> it's what I was looking for.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Along those same lines, j6 shows a representation of an
> > > expression
> > > > > in
> > > > > >>>>> boxes
> > > > > >>>>>> which I've found to be helpful to understand how an
> expression
> > > is
> > > > > >>>>> grouped.
> > > > > >>>>>> I haven't seen that same functionality in j7 or j8. Does it
> > > exist?
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> I find myself spending a fair amount of time taking an
> > > expression
> > > > > and
> > > > > >>>>> then
> > > > > >>>>>> looking up its parts in the Vocabulary to understand what
> its
> > > doing.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >>>>>> For information about J forums see
> > > > > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >>>>> For information about J forums see
> > > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >>>> For information about J forums see
> > > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >>> For information about J forums see
> > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > > >>
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >> For information about J forums see
> > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > For information about J forums see
> > > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > > >
> > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >
> > > --
> > > regards,
> > > ====================================================
> > > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> > > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> --
> regards,
> ====================================================
> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to