I can answer that these all replace domain errors. I cannot try the patch yet.
patches 3 and 4 may conflict with each other though probably not. (a c a v) could/should be an adverb train. ((a c a) v) -> c v (or? a (c (a v))) (a c a v v) might be ambiguous too. I find patch 3 more useful and intuitive than patch 4, and I assume that c v v still binds as (c v) v, in which case it retains the above intuitiveness, but I could see problems with (a v v v v v... v) ----- Original Message ----- From: bill lam <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: Sent: Sunday, March 9, 2014 12:06:18 AM Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] J Extensions Will it change current J semantics or break existing code? If it is compatible with current J701 engine, I'll try to add it into android libj.so which is also GPL licensed. Is there any test suite for the extensions? Actually I don't understand those extensions, sorry to be slow. Сб, 08 мар 2014, Jose Mario Quintana писал(а): > The patches, a Windows 32-bit DLL, a cheatsheet, 32 and 64 bit Unix > libraries are found at: > > > http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/ > > > For more details and demonstration code, see the article in the Journal of > J: http://journalofj.com/index.php/vol-2-no-2-october-2013 (only the > definition of the new conjunction knot (`.) has been slightly modified for > the release). > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
