Thanks for explanation. A related question, how to do the inverse of ]: ie to get the linear representation of an anonymous functional?
10.03.2014, в 3:30, Jose Mario Quintana <[email protected]> написал(а): > Yes, the verb ]: produces non-nouns and the reason for defining it as a > verb is because it becomes much more powerful this way. Why? Fortunately > for me Dan has already has explained masterfully why, in the context of > cloaking agenda (@.) as a verb in > http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2013-January/031249.html ; > he was not aware at that time that a cloaked @. is a wicked verb but that > only strengthens his arguments. Here there is an example of this power, > involving the verb ]:, for cloaking a few conjunctions and assigning them > to multiple verbs (evoke, power, agenda and at) at once, > > ( 'evoke power agenda at'=. ]: @: < &.> @: ;: '`: ^: @. @:' ) > ┌───────────┬───────────┬───────────┬───────────┐ > │(]:(<'`:'))│(]:(<'^:'))│(]:(<'@.'))│(]:(<'@:'))│ > └───────────┴───────────┴───────────┴───────────┘ > > Moreover, I routinely cloak as verbs all the primitive adverbs and > conjunctions using a script containing the pertinent sentences on page 33 > on the article in the Journal of J referred in the my initial post. > > I doubt Lev and Dex will be resurrected as [. and ]. because they can be > defined easily explicitly and now even tacitly (see, > http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2014-March/035796.html ). > Yet, that is beside the point, it would be safer to define Trigger and > Trap as, for instance, [.. and ].. ; but, my understanding is that the > implementation becomes more difficult. > > > > > On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > >> These are good questions. >> >> I like these questions. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Raul >> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:22 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Does the verb Cloak X ]: Y return a non-noun? If so, why ]: is >>> not a conjunction? >>> >>> tokens [. and ]. were previously Lev and Dex, will it be better >>> to reserve them for the possible resurrection of Lev and Dex; >>> and use other tokens for Trigger and Trap? >>> >>> Pardon me if my questions are silly. >>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
