Yes, the verb ]: produces non-nouns and the reason for defining it as a
verb is because it becomes much more powerful this way.  Why?  Fortunately
for me Dan has already has explained masterfully why, in the context of
cloaking agenda (@.) as a verb in
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2013-January/031249.html ;
he was not aware at that time that a cloaked @. is a wicked verb but that
only strengthens his arguments.  Here there is an example of this power,
involving the verb ]:, for cloaking a few conjunctions and assigning them
to multiple verbs (evoke, power, agenda and at) at once,

   ( 'evoke power agenda at'=. ]: @: < &.> @: ;: '`: ^: @. @:' )
┌───────────┬───────────┬───────────┬───────────┐
│(]:(<'`:'))│(]:(<'^:'))│(]:(<'@.'))│(]:(<'@:'))│
└───────────┴───────────┴───────────┴───────────┘

Moreover, I routinely cloak as verbs all the primitive adverbs and
conjunctions using a script containing the pertinent sentences on page 33
on the article in the Journal of J referred in the my initial post.

I doubt Lev and Dex will be resurrected as [. and ]. because they can be
defined easily explicitly and now even tacitly (see,
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2014-March/035796.html ).
 Yet, that is beside the point, it would be safer to define Trigger and
Trap as, for instance, [.. and ].. ; but, my understanding is that the
implementation becomes more difficult.




On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> These are good questions.
>
> I like these questions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:22 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Does the verb Cloak X ]: Y return a non-noun? If so, why ]: is
> > not a conjunction?
> >
> > tokens [. and ]. were previously Lev and Dex, will it be better
> > to reserve them for the possible resurrection of Lev and Dex;
> > and use other tokens for Trigger and Trap?
> >
> > Pardon me if my questions are silly.
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to