Agreed, but can the result from rank infinity (+ %) be understood? On Friday, May 9, 2014, Roger Hui <[email protected]> wrote:
> rank 0. > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Kip Murray > <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > Here is a verb that defeats the system's table adverb. What is going on? > > > > table > > 1 : (':'; '(((#~LF-.@e.])5!:5<''u'');,.y),.({.;}.)":x,y u/x')~ > > > > 0 1 2 3 (+ %) table 0 1 2 3 NB. misbehaves > > +---+----------------------+ > > |+ %|0 | > > +---+----------------------+ > > |0 | 1 2 3 _ 2 2.5 3.33333| > > |1 | | > > |2 | | > > |3 | | > > +---+----------------------+ > > > > 0 1 2 3 % table 0 1 2 3 NB. normal behavior > > +-+----------------+ > > |%|0 1 2 3| > > +-+----------------+ > > |0|0 0 0 0| > > |1|_ 1 0.5 0.333333| > > |2|_ 2 1 0.666667| > > |3|_ 3 1.5 1| > > +-+----------------+ > > > > --Kip Murray > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from Gmail Mobile > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
