Linda, this is GOOD ! Thanks. --Kip
On Monday, May 12, 2014, Linda Alvord <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kip, I enjoyed this problem. I created the following script to randomly
> generate lists and then create the stemplot. Save in a new jijx. Then run
> it. Remove the NB. in the second line to see another example. Do the same
> for the third line. Removing the NB. from the fourth line will generate
> new
> data. Hopefully it won't fail. Id appreciate inprovements within simple J
> from anyone.
>
> D=:/:~ 17 133 151 47 12 19 52 80 32 87 24 14 20 90 9 47 72 7 36 64
> NB.D=:/:~50 83 95 107 113 113 116 116 118 123
> NB.D=:11 11 31 73 74 92 104 114 129 133
> NB.D=:/:~ (>:?15)+?10#140
>
> sl=: 13 :'''S L''=:|:0 10#:y'
> sl D
> S
> L
>
> ]DO=:(<./S)+i.>:(>./S)-<./S
>
> ]WL=:":,.(DO e. S)#DO
>
> ]WOL=:":,.(-.DO e. S)#DO
>
> ]SS=:(|."1(|."1 WL),|."1 WOL),.'|'
>
> ]LS=:S ":/. L
>
> ]NLS=:((0{$WOL),1{$LS)$' '
>
> ]SP=: SS,. LS, NLS
>
> ]OS=: (".0 1{"1 SS)-0{DO
>
> ]G=: OS i. i.$DO
>
> ]GOOD=:G {"2 SP
>
> ]D
>
> In these days I guess you could call it a stem plot "app". In any case,
> when you understand any steps you can remove ] from a given line and it
> will no longer provide that result. Eventually, if you remove them all,
> you
> can make a stem plot of two digit numbers. I would have able to develop
> this
> and then use it in a high school Probability and Statistics class.
>
> Linda
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] <javascript:;>
> [mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>] On
> Behalf Of Kip Murray
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 3:36 PM
> To: [email protected] <javascript:;>
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Table Adverb
>
> But not a random mess. We can observe
>
> 0 1 2 3 (+ %)/ 0 1 2 3
> _ 2 2.5 3.33333
>
> 0 1 2 3 (+ %)"0/ 0 1 2 3 NB. notice the diagonal
> _ 1 0.5 0.333333
> _ 2 1.5 1.33333
> _ 3 2.5 2.33333
> _ 4 3.5 3.33333
>
> 0 1 2 3 (+ %)table 0 1 2 3
> +---+----------------------+
> |+ %|0 |
> +---+----------------------+
> |0 | 1 2 3 _ 2 2.5 3.33333|
> |1 | |
> |2 | |
> |3 | |
> +---+----------------------+
>
> The body above is (part of "expected" heading) , diagonal . Perhaps a new
> table adverb could restore 1 2 3 to the heading and display _ 2 2.5 3.33333
> as the diagonal of the body, with spaces elsewhere in the body.
>
> Or perhaps not. I don't know whether the behavior of (+ %)/ above is
> typical for rank infinity arguments to adverb / .
>
> On Friday, May 9, 2014, Roger Hui <[email protected]<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > I believe the table adverb assumes that the verb has rank 0. If it does
> > not, then you get a mess. Y'know: GIGO.
> >
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
