I believe the table adverb assumes that the verb has rank 0. If it does not, then you get a mess. Y'know: GIGO.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Kip Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, but can the result from rank infinity (+ %) be understood? > > On Friday, May 9, 2014, Roger Hui <[email protected]> wrote: > > > rank 0. > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Kip Murray <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Here is a verb that defeats the system's table adverb. What is going > on? > > > > > > table > > > 1 : (':'; '(((#~LF-.@e.])5!:5<''u'');,.y),.({.;}.)":x,y u/x')~ > > > > > > 0 1 2 3 (+ %) table 0 1 2 3 NB. misbehaves > > > +---+----------------------+ > > > |+ %|0 | > > > +---+----------------------+ > > > |0 | 1 2 3 _ 2 2.5 3.33333| > > > |1 | | > > > |2 | | > > > |3 | | > > > +---+----------------------+ > > > > > > 0 1 2 3 % table 0 1 2 3 NB. normal behavior > > > +-+----------------+ > > > |%|0 1 2 3| > > > +-+----------------+ > > > |0|0 0 0 0| > > > |1|_ 1 0.5 0.333333| > > > |2|_ 2 1 0.666667| > > > |3|_ 3 1.5 1| > > > +-+----------------+ > > > > > > --Kip Murray > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sent from Gmail Mobile > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > -- > Sent from Gmail Mobile > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
