It is not possible to reformulate the verb trains with caps so that most
of the &'s and @'s are no longer needed? So that it is shown they had no
actual function? /Erling
On 2014-07-13 17:20, Tracy Harms wrote:
On Jul 13, 2014 6:41 AM, "Erling Hellenäs" <[email protected]> wrote:
Most of the &'s and @'s are written not because they are needed
as operators, but are used only as padding, to avoid the othervise
automatic creation of hooks and forks?
No. It seems inaccurate to call that "padding." They apply at a meta-level.
They do not interfere with the formation of verb trains, they contribute to
the formation of verb trains.
--
T
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
