I was on vacation eating and drinking at street side stands in Mexico City and sun bathing on the Mayan Riviera. I am sorry. Nah, I am not.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Erling Hellenäs <[email protected]> wrote: > Didn't we finish this thread? How about a new thread, possibly with > summaries from earlier discussions? This thread was only about indexed > replacement and Amend? /Erling > > > On 2014-07-20 21:17, Jose Mario Quintana wrote: > >> "It's déjà vu all over again." :) >> >> ( >> http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2009-December/017478.html >> http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2009-December/017480.html >> http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2009-December/017482.html >> ) >> >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Erling Hellenäs <[email protected] >> > >> wrote: >> >> In most languages indexed replacement is indexed replacement? In J and in >>> most functional languages it is not? You get a brand new variable? So, >>> why >>> give the user the flawed impression he can still do indexed replacement >>> and >>> do amendments to variables/nouns? And at the same time in tacit code we >>> pretend to only have functions? No variables/nouns to be amended? Just >>> functional transformations? >>> /Erling >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
