I can't follow and it seems I might be misinterpreted. /Erling
On 2014-07-20 23:04, Jose Mario Quintana wrote:
I was on vacation eating and drinking at street side stands in Mexico City
and sun bathing on the Mayan Riviera. I am sorry. Nah, I am not.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Erling Hellenäs <[email protected]>
wrote:
Didn't we finish this thread? How about a new thread, possibly with
summaries from earlier discussions? This thread was only about indexed
replacement and Amend? /Erling
On 2014-07-20 21:17, Jose Mario Quintana wrote:
"It's déjà vu all over again." :)
(
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2009-December/017478.html
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2009-December/017480.html
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2009-December/017482.html
)
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Erling Hellenäs <[email protected]
wrote:
In most languages indexed replacement is indexed replacement? In J and in
most functional languages it is not? You get a brand new variable? So,
why
give the user the flawed impression he can still do indexed replacement
and
do amendments to variables/nouns? And at the same time in tacit code we
pretend to only have functions? No variables/nouns to be amended? Just
functional transformations?
/Erling
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
