Yes, that's what I meant. Try selecting first and last n rows from data
frame. Actually R's indexing ([) is very lax and can trump people (at least
it has me) in strange ways. http://adv-r.had.co.nz/Subsetting.html How
about subsetting with floats? J raises 'domain error'...R
does...<quote>Numeric values are coerced to integer as by 'as.integer' (and
hence truncated towards zero).</quote> I know this because I've made this
mistake a couple of times!

One of the things that I really like about J is how regular it is....at
least after you get *slightly more* comfortable with it.


On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Devon McCormick <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think he means this by "mixing +ve and -ve":
>    0 1 _2 _1 { i.10
> 0 1 8 9
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Joe Bogner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I also use { extensively (dyadic). I appreciate the challenge of
> > coming up with a minimal list. One criteria may be: can it be done
> > relatively easily with one of the other operations?
> >
> > For {, it's fairly easy to use {. and }....
> >
> > For example: {. 3 }. 0 1 2 3 4 5
> >
> > With a trivial case, the performance is negligible, but perhaps not as
> > readable
> >
> >    100 timespacex '{. 9999999 }. i. 1e7'
> > 0.0248935 1.3422e8
> >
> >    100 timespacex '9999999 { i. 1e7'
> > 0.0269468 1.3422e8
> >
> > I mostly use it for simple indexing. I didn't understand your comment
> > about mixing +ve and -ve. Can you elaborate?
> >
> > [by the way, excellent list Devon. I may use it to extend my
> > coffeescript implementation of APL to have functioning examples for
> > each of those operations]
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Vijay Lulla <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Just out of curiosity, why is { not included? I use it extensively for
> > my J
> > > explorations. Also, it is much more regular and useful(flexible?) than
> > > indexing in other languages. For e.g., You cannot mix +ve and -ve
> indexes
> > > in R but it works as expected (at least for me) in J. Regardless, nice
> > work.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Vijay.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Devon McCormick <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Based on Skip's suggestion, this  page is now here -
> > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/DevonMcCormick/MinimalBeginningJ - and
> > is
> > >> titled "Minimal J for Beginners".
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Devon McCormick <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Good point - I picked up the "J Kernel" label from the discussion.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Skip Cave <[email protected]
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Devon, nice job of putting together a reduced set of primitives for
> > rhe
> > >> >> beginner. The only issue I see is the name. As a beginner, I would
> > never
> > >> >> think to find a set of most-commonly-used primitives under the name
> > "J
> > >> >> Kernel" That actually sounds like a discussion of the internals of
> J,
> > >> >> which
> > >> >> is what I thought when I read the subject of your email. I doubt
> > that a
> > >> >> beginner would check out a page with that label. A title like "J's
> > Basic
> > >> >> Commands for Beginners" or equivalent, would be more likely to
> > attract
> > >> the
> > >> >> intended audience.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Skp
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Skip Cave
> > >> >> Cave Consulting LLC
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Devon McCormick <
> [email protected]>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Based on some feedback from Greg Borota last year on his
> > experiences
> > >> >> > learning J, I've put together a page on the J Wiki -
> > >> >> > http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/DevonMcCormick/JKernel - that
> has a
> > >> few
> > >> >> > selected things from J on which a beginner can concentrate to
> avoid
> > >> >> being
> > >> >> > overwhelmed by the language in full.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > It's a pretty bare minimum and I couldn't find a good link that
> > >> explains
> > >> >> > J's use of single quote for quoted strings but everyone should
> feel
> > >> >> free to
> > >> >> > add to it - sparingly, as it's supposed to be a reduced set of
> the
> > >> >> > language.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > It might make sense to leave the existing page much as it is and
> to
> > >> >> think
> > >> >> > about a 2nd tier of slightly more advanced verbs and such.  There
> > were
> > >> >> good
> > >> >> > suggestions in the original discussion -
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> http://jsoftware.2058.n7.nabble.com/Learning-J-language-initial-thoughts-td52786.html#a52793
> > >> >> > - that I elided as I consider them more than the bare minimum
> > (things
> > >> >> like
> > >> >> > rank modifiers and logic verbs).
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > --
> > >> >> > Devon McCormick, CFA
> > >> >> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >> > For information about J forums see
> > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >> For information about J forums see
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Devon McCormick, CFA
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Devon McCormick, CFA
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Devon McCormick, CFA
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to