As soon as we get j804 release out we will move on getting new source and infrastructure available. This should be in place early in the new year.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Joe Bogner <[email protected]> wrote: > Might be a relevant time to ask for an update on the git repo for J > GPL source: http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/chat/2015-June/006648.html > > I haven't heard anything since June. Is there an update? > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:26 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think this bug is serious. If anyone can provide a patch >> based on the j701 GPL source and related test script, >> then I can merge the fix into the next release. >> >> Чт, 17 дек 2015, Henry Rich написал(а): >>> ? (32$2) , 32 $ 1000 >>> >>> 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 >>> 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 >>> >>> >>> The chance of getting that with no bug is about 1 in 10^86. There's a bug. >>> >>> >>> The question is, Why can't we just fix it? If I wanted to put in the >>> change, how would I do so and get the change into a release? >>> >>> >>> We have a bug list of 50 or so errors, some serious. If this language is >>> going to live, it needs to be able to grow. >>> >>> >>> Henry Rich >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12/17/2015 9:08 PM, bill lam wrote: >>> >I think there are already enough evidences to call for >>> >further investigation to prove or disprove the bug. >>> > >>> >Чт, 17 дек 2015, Raul Miller написал(а): >>> >>On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:40 PM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming >>> >><[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>?. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 >>> >>>2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 >>> >>>0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 >>> >>>1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 8 9 6 8 14 7 12 9 1 15 2 15 3 13 3 >>> >>> >>> >>>?. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 >>> >>>2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 >>> >>>0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 >>> >>>0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>one less leading 2 in first example. 47 leading 2s, correct result. 48 >>> >>>leading 2s and everything is 2. >>> >>So? >>> >> >>> >>Consider this: >>> >> >>> >> ?.4#4 >>> >>2 0 0 2 >>> >> 4{.?.400#4 >>> >>2 0 2 0 >>> >> >>> >>The size of the right argument influences the values generated at each >>> >>position. >>> >> >>> >>You would need to perform a large number of experiments to show a >>> >>statistical flaw in the results. >>> >> >>> >>-- >>> >>Raul >>> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> >> -- >> regards, >> ==================================================== >> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 >> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 >> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3 >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
