There is something wrong with how your email client quotes my email, or how my email system sends them to you, so I am going to trim quotes and reply inline here.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Martin Kreuzer <[email protected]> wrote: > Your next to last sentence reads, I quote, > "Put differently, we do not need the "1 (from 1 {"1 y) because we get an > implicit "0 from our use of @ (in 1&{@#:)" > > Q: Should this read "... because we get an ** implicit "1 ** from our use of > ..."..? > If not, then I'm most probably still missing something. Consider this example: 3 5 5 #: 13 17 0 2 3 0 3 2 Here, the number 13 corresponds to the row 0 2 3, and the number 17 corresponds to the row 0 3 2. So if we deal with the result separately, we need to pull the second column from rank 1 (rows), while if we build a verb that does both steps together, that verb will be dealing with rank 0 (individual numbers). Does that help put things in perspective? Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
