The non-J answer first (anything else later):
[1] Yes, I'm quite aware of the mess I'm sending out again.
[2] It only happens with messages from JSoftware forum mail system.
[3] No, I've not been able yet to track down where that happens.
I've been using the same client (Eudora v7) for many, many years and
it worked fine (and still does) with many different Mailsystems,
be it AOL, GMail, or whatever.
But over the years Mail servers have seen many changes.
Any message I compose looks right on sending, and
the return from JSoftware looks scrambled like CR and LF wasn't yet invented.
This has not been so in the past; when I trace back in time,
it seems to have started in _3rd quarter of 2011_.
Before that, I received those forum mails in a regular format.
Funny thing is, when I have a look at my providers webmail,
messages look still alright.
As a test, I (manually) forwarded your last message this morning
to my collective account, and that came through alright.
So I'm still bit of a loss here ...
I do not know who best to talk to, but I'm prepared to test with
another mail account
(at a different provider's site) to see whether the effect goes away.
-M
At 2016-06-14 21:49, you wrote:
There is something wrong with how your email client quotes my email,
or how my email system sends them to you, so I am going to trim
quotes and reply inline here. On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:34 PM,
Martin Kreuzer <[email protected]> wrote: > Your next to last
sentence reads, I quote, > "Put differently, we do not need the "1
(from 1 {"1 y) because we get an > implicit "0 from our use of @ (in
1&{@#:)" > > Q: Should this read "... because we get an ** implicit
"1 ** from our use of > ..."..? > If not, then I'm most probably
still missing something. Consider this example: 3 5 5 #: 13 17 0
2 3 0 3 2 Here, the number 13 corresponds to the row 0 2 3, and the
number 17 corresponds to the row 0 3 2. So if we deal with the
result separately, we need to pull the second column from rank 1
(rows), while if we build a verb that does both steps together, that
verb will be dealing with rank 0 (individual numbers). Does that
help put things in perspective? Thanks, -- Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
