Gilles,

I was tempted to drop linux32 support as we had some problems and I didn't
really think through who might still want to run it.

You points on linux32 are valid and we again have a clean 805 build on that
platform. There is a good chance it will be supported in the final 805
release.

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Eric Iverson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> We are looking at the 13!:0 bug and there is a good chance it will be
> fixed for the 805 final release.
>
> I know this is an old bug and thanks for bringing it to our attention
> again.
>
> Future bugs will have a better chance of being fixed if they are reported
> at:
> http://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/System/Interpreter/Bugs/Errors
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Gilles Kirouac <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>    >>> J805 will NOT support J32 for linux and mac.
>>
>>
>>     This is about a bug in J804 for linux32 which crashes J.
>>
>> ===================================
>> [gilles@NetV03 j804]$ bin/jconsole
>>       Adv=: 1 : 0
>> u
>> y
>> (
>> )
>>       13!:0 ]1   NB. Reset and activate debugger
>>       + Adv 2
>> |syntax error: Adv
>> |   (
>> |Adv[2]
>>          13!:0 ] 0  NB. Reset and deactivate debugger
>> Erreur de segmentation
>> [gilles@NetV03 j804]$
>> ===================================
>>
>>      This very old bug (since the birth of 13!: ?) has been reported many
>> times under various disguises with MS-Win, notably by Devon and   Oleg.
>>
>>      It has been corrected with the release of j803 for Windows, but not
>> for Linux (same source?). Many thanks to whoever made the correction!
>>
>>      IMO, the debugger is an essential tool with scripts using explicit
>> adverbs and conjunctions, for tracing repeated calls of arg verb(s) (for
>> instance, to trace Devon's climb adverb at http://code.jsoftware.com/wiki
>> /NYCJUG/2009-08-11 ).
>>
>>      The Linux 32b platform is likely to remain a platform used in
>> schools for quite some time.
>>
>>      Could we not have a final Linux32 J version without this bug?
>>
>>
>>      ~ Gilles
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 29/09/2016 à 19:41, Eric Iverson a écrit :
>>
>>> By J32 on linux I meant specifically linux on x64-intel hardware. This
>>> does
>>> not affect rpi or other platforms that require (or have a real benefit
>>> from) a 32bit version. We are not killing J32, just J32 on linux-x64intel
>>> and mac-x64intel.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Joey K Tuttle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> OK on the Mac side - maybe an issue with Linux on older machines (or
>>>> maybe
>>>> some newish things like Raspberry Pi v2), but time marches on ... (and I
>>>> have to blushingly admit that j504 is used a lot in my older machines so
>>>> can't complain seriously there...)
>>>>
>>>> - joey
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2016 Sep 29, at 16:32 , Eric Iverson <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Building and testing J32 new releases for linux and mac is a serious
>>>>> nuisance.
>>>>>
>>>>> We doubt there is any requirement not adequately covered by 804 and
>>>>>
>>>> earlier
>>>>
>>>>> J32 releases.
>>>>>
>>>>> We will continue to support J32 for windows as that is an easier
>>>>> platform
>>>>> and that should be enough to keep our 32bit version honest for other
>>>>>
>>>> 32bit
>>>>
>>>>> only platforms.
>>>>>
>>>>> J805 will NOT support J32 for linux and mac.
>>>>>
>>>>> Comments?
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to