Ah! The special form for } x (v0`v1`v2)} y
Great! What about a user-defined adverb? If I define an adverb to pretend I can have three parameters. On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:53 AM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming <[email protected]> wrote: > 11 22 33&( 0:`(<:@])`[}) 2 > 11 0 33 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Moon S <[email protected]> > To: programming <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 6:36 PM > Subject: [Jprogramming] Tacit definition involving adverb argument > > Is there a tacit definition of such a verb? Is there a way to pass a > value to the adverb? > > f =: 3 : '0 (<:y)} 11 22 33' > > f 1 > 0 22 33 > f 2 > 11 0 33 > > > PS. Also, I couldn't suspect that besides a usual definition of dyad > adverb such as > > 1 : ('';':';'...x...m...y...') NB. explicit defs inside > > there's also a shorter way: > > 1 : '...[...x...]...' NB. tacit defs inside > > Of course the reading of The Phrases is very useful... but so hard! > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
