"There is nothing new under the sun." See [0] :) [0] Jforum: Tacitly puzzled by an amendment... , jquint http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2000-September/004192.html
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2000-September/004192.html On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Moon S <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah! The special form for } > > x (v0`v1`v2)} y > > Great! > > What about a user-defined adverb? If I define an adverb to pretend I > can have three parameters. > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:53 AM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming > <[email protected]> wrote: > > 11 22 33&( 0:`(<:@])`[}) 2 > > 11 0 33 > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Moon S <[email protected]> > > To: programming <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 6:36 PM > > Subject: [Jprogramming] Tacit definition involving adverb argument > > > > Is there a tacit definition of such a verb? Is there a way to pass a > > value to the adverb? > > > > f =: 3 : '0 (<:y)} 11 22 33' > > > > f 1 > > 0 22 33 > > f 2 > > 11 0 33 > > > > > > PS. Also, I couldn't suspect that besides a usual definition of dyad > > adverb such as > > > > 1 : ('';':';'...x...m...y...') NB. explicit defs inside > > > > there's also a shorter way: > > > > 1 : '...[...x...]...' NB. tacit defs inside > > > > Of course the reading of The Phrases is very useful... but so hard! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
