> " I supplied the first number that had
 as a permutation of the digits given sorted by
 (%totient)n"

No, from the values that is that are permutations of their totients, the 
question wants
the minimum value of N % totient N.
So after finding all the values that are permutations of their totients, you 
need to divide them by the totient
and find which number is the minimum.

Also, I stole totient from J phrases too.

--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 3/15/17, Don Guinn <[email protected]> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Project Euler
 To: "Programming forum" <[email protected]>
 Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2017, 12:09 PM
 
 My second approach was
 brute force like you did. It gave the same number as
 my first approach. And interestingly it was
 faster than my first approach.
 Happens
 sometimes. The only thing I can think of is that I found the
 answer
 but I didn't supply what they
 wanted. I supplied the first number that had
 as a permutation of the digits given sorted by
 (%totient)n . I cheated.
 Stole totient from
 J phrases.
 
 The only thing I
 can think of is that they wanted something other than the
 n that I found.
 
 On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:12 PM, 'Jon
 Hough' via Programming <
 [email protected]>
 wrote:
 
 > I just tried it
 and got the right answer. But my approach is essentially
 > brute force:
 > I
 basically stringified  (":) the totient result, sorted
 it, and compared
 > to the sorted
 stringified original number.
 >
 > I can be more specific if you like.
 >
 > Regards,
 > Jon
 >
 --------------------------------------------
 > On Wed, 3/15/17, Don Guinn <[email protected]>
 wrote:
 >
 >  Subject:
 [Jprogramming] Project Euler
 >  To:
 "Programming forum" <[email protected]>
 >  Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2017, 9:37
 AM
 >
 >  Has anyone
 out there solved problem
 >  70? I have
 worked it two ways which
 >  give the
 same answer but it is given as incorrect. I don't
 >  want to divulge
 > 
 what I did as that is against their rules. I must be
 missing
 >  something and
 >  presenting the wrong number for the
 result. Or is it
 >  possible that
 their
 >  answer is wrong?
 >
 >  Glad to discuss it
 in the forum, but if anyone wants to
 > 
 contact me
 >  privately so we don't
 break Project Euler rules, contact me
 > 
 at
 >  [email protected]
 >
 >  Thanks.
 > 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 >  For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
 >
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to