> Also, I stole totient from J phrases too. You can also steal it from the vocabulary, e.g.
5 p: 12 4 On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:24 PM, 'Jon Hough' via Programming < [email protected]> wrote: > > " I supplied the first number that had > as a permutation of the digits given sorted by > (%totient)n" > > No, from the values that is that are permutations of their totients, the > question wants > the minimum value of N % totient N. > So after finding all the values that are permutations of their totients, > you need to divide them by the totient > and find which number is the minimum. > > Also, I stole totient from J phrases too. > > -------------------------------------------- > On Wed, 3/15/17, Don Guinn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Project Euler > To: "Programming forum" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2017, 12:09 PM > > My second approach was > brute force like you did. It gave the same number as > my first approach. And interestingly it was > faster than my first approach. > Happens > sometimes. The only thing I can think of is that I found the > answer > but I didn't supply what they > wanted. I supplied the first number that had > as a permutation of the digits given sorted by > (%totient)n . I cheated. > Stole totient from > J phrases. > > The only thing I > can think of is that they wanted something other than the > n that I found. > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:12 PM, 'Jon > Hough' via Programming < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > I just tried it > and got the right answer. But my approach is essentially > > brute force: > > I > basically stringified (":) the totient result, sorted > it, and compared > > to the sorted > stringified original number. > > > > I can be more specific if you like. > > > > Regards, > > Jon > > > -------------------------------------------- > > On Wed, 3/15/17, Don Guinn <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Subject: > [Jprogramming] Project Euler > > To: > "Programming forum" <[email protected]> > > Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2017, 9:37 > AM > > > > Has anyone > out there solved problem > > 70? I have > worked it two ways which > > give the > same answer but it is given as incorrect. I don't > > want to divulge > > > what I did as that is against their rules. I must be > missing > > something and > > presenting the wrong number for the > result. Or is it > > possible that > their > > answer is wrong? > > > > Glad to discuss it > in the forum, but if anyone wants to > > > contact me > > privately so we don't > break Project Euler rules, contact me > > > at > > [email protected] > > > > Thanks. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
