Wow! Missed 5 p: . Maybe time to read through the vocabulary again. On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:41 PM, chris burke <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Also, I stole totient from J phrases too. > > You can also steal it from the vocabulary, e.g. > > 5 p: 12 > 4 > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:24 PM, 'Jon Hough' via Programming < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > " I supplied the first number that had > > as a permutation of the digits given sorted by > > (%totient)n" > > > > No, from the values that is that are permutations of their totients, the > > question wants > > the minimum value of N % totient N. > > So after finding all the values that are permutations of their totients, > > you need to divide them by the totient > > and find which number is the minimum. > > > > Also, I stole totient from J phrases too. > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > On Wed, 3/15/17, Don Guinn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Project Euler > > To: "Programming forum" <[email protected]> > > Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2017, 12:09 PM > > > > My second approach was > > brute force like you did. It gave the same number as > > my first approach. And interestingly it was > > faster than my first approach. > > Happens > > sometimes. The only thing I can think of is that I found the > > answer > > but I didn't supply what they > > wanted. I supplied the first number that had > > as a permutation of the digits given sorted by > > (%totient)n . I cheated. > > Stole totient from > > J phrases. > > > > The only thing I > > can think of is that they wanted something other than the > > n that I found. > > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:12 PM, 'Jon > > Hough' via Programming < > > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I just tried it > > and got the right answer. But my approach is essentially > > > brute force: > > > I > > basically stringified (":) the totient result, sorted > > it, and compared > > > to the sorted > > stringified original number. > > > > > > I can be more specific if you like. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Jon > > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > > On Wed, 3/15/17, Don Guinn <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Subject: > > [Jprogramming] Project Euler > > > To: > > "Programming forum" <[email protected]> > > > Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2017, 9:37 > > AM > > > > > > Has anyone > > out there solved problem > > > 70? I have > > worked it two ways which > > > give the > > same answer but it is given as incorrect. I don't > > > want to divulge > > > > > what I did as that is against their rules. I must be > > missing > > > something and > > > presenting the wrong number for the > > result. Or is it > > > possible that > > their > > > answer is wrong? > > > > > > Glad to discuss it > > in the forum, but if anyone wants to > > > > > contact me > > > privately so we don't > > break Project Euler rules, contact me > > > > > at > > > [email protected] > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/ > forums.htm > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/ > forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
