Even if Raul wouldn't consider them meaningful for some reason I don't
understand it seems he should still understand that they are performance
measurements? That I am creating a loop over a piece of code to measure
the performance of this piece of code? /Erling
On 2017-10-02 17:01, Don Guinn wrote:
How many times do you have to be told that these kinds of measurements and
meaningless?
On Oct 2, 2017 8:57 AM, "Erling Hellenäs" <[email protected]> wrote:
How many times do I have to tell that I do this to measure performance?
/Erling
On 2017-10-02 16:39, Raul Miller wrote:
Generally speaking, you want to push the large arrays into J's
primitives as much as possible. Going the other direction, like you're
doing here (using relatively expensive functions at rank 0 on
relatively large arrays) is mostly going to bog down.
Thanks,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
