The null case here should be ] (-@- -: ]) v 1
Thanks, -- Raul On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Erling Hellenäs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all ! > > Here are the same measurements with a null case we can deduct, if we want to > know the exact speed on my particular machine. > > ts'-AtTacit-AtTacit-AtTacit-AtTacit-@- v' > 0.261088 1.32199e8 > ts'-AtTacit-AtTacit-AtTacit-AtTacit-AtopTacit- v' > 0.264798 1.322e8 > ts'-At-At-At-At-Atop- v' > 2.97941 1.32204e8 > ts'-@:-@:-@:-@:-@- v' > 0.156113 1.32197e8 > ts'-@- v' > 0.091478 1.32195e8 > > Cheers, > Erling > > On 2017-10-02 17:24, Raul Miller wrote: >> >> Believe me, I understood that. >> >> But this particular performance measure is rather like measuring the >> performance of tires sliding sideways (as opposed to rolling) in a >> parking lot while carrying several hundred pounds of meatloaf. >> >> In other words, it's not something I would feel comfortable optimizing >> for, though I can sort of almost see some sort of vague connection to >> real applications if I do not think about it too much. >> >> Thanks, >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
