> On Nov 22, 2017, at 12:51 AM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: > > The edition doesn't matter, the core j language had been stabilized 2 > decades ago.
Thanks. This isn't obvious from the document, so I appreciate knowing this. > PS. J general forum is mainly used for discussion of installation issues. > It is unfortunate that its name is misleading. When unsure, post to the j > programming forum. I'll be sure and do that in the future. > On Nov 22, 2017 12:22 PM, "Daniel Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Rob, > >> On Nov 21, 2017, at 8:32 PM, Rob Hodgkinson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So it is never really “out of date” but moreso “preserved” (perhaps one > day, after people experiment in new “dialects” and implementations > (courtesy of the open source licence) an updated edition may appear). > > Oh—I really didn't mean the book itself, just that edition of the book, > since I figured the one on the website/in the addons has been updated since > then. But maybe that isn't true; the one on the website actually says > 2001-5-3 versus 2002-09-10. > > -- > Daniel Lyons > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- Daniel Lyons ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
