Yes Ric, better not to create them. In my haste I left out the parentheses, putting them back in does the "right thing" :
2 4 6 <@(<\) 'abcdefg' ┌───────────────────┬─────────────────────┬───────────────┐ │┌──┬──┬──┬──┬──┬──┐│┌────┬────┬────┬────┐│┌──────┬──────┐│ ││ab│bc│cd│de│ef│fg│││abcd│bcde│cdef│defg│││abcdef│bcdefg││ │└──┴──┴──┴──┴──┴──┘│└────┴────┴────┴────┘│└──────┴──────┘│ └───────────────────┴─────────────────────┴───────────────┘ On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:14 PM Ric Sherlock <tikk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here you go Skip. Simple, but seems cleaner to me to prevent the creation > of the unwanted fill in the first place. > > a: -.~ ,(>:i.5)<\'abcde' > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:00 AM Skip Cave <s...@caveconsulting.com> wrote: > > > Removing the empty cells: > > > > a#~-.(<'')=a=.,(>:i.5)<\'abcde' > > > > │a│b│c│d│e│ab│bc│cd│de│abc│bcd│cde│abcd│bcde│abcde│ > > > > I'm sure this can be reduced by J experts in implicit coding. > > > > Skip > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
