On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 12:29 AM Don Kelly <d...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> _ _ _  HUH? 0 0 0  where i am using HUH? to indicate that  for x=0 the
> result is indeterminant.  Creep up on 0   and no matter how close to 0
> you get -the results are the same. Crossing 0  is a discontinuous jump
> directly from infinity to 0

indeterminant is a good way of putting this.

On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 10:11 AM Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> See https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/9205211.pdf esp. p. 6

I think you're referring to Knuth's allusions to Cauchy's treatment of
Principal Value?

I tried reading through Knuth's writeup there for his take on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_value in this context. But it
felt like he only got close to that topic, without actually addressing
it.

Taking a few steps back, from my perspective (viewing mathematics as
approaches for dealing with systems of carefully chosen constraints),
An expression of the form:

x = y ^ 0

can be viewed as a constraint on the value of x, such that

y = y ^ 1

Or: x is a number which when multiplied by y gives a result of y. And,
for example, if y is 2 then x is 1.

But when y is 0, any number works for x. So, it's "indeterminant".
This doesn't mean that 1 is an incorrect answer, but it does mean that
it's not the only answer.

But this particular situation is not the only example where
mathematics allows for multiple answers. Square root is another
example.

In J, 1 = %: 1 even though 1 = _1 * _1

And functions like arcsin (_1&o.) have a theoretical infinite number
of solutions, though it's common practice to neglect that issue when
performing calculations.

But the problem with 0^0 isn't so much that the result is unknown, but
that it's difficult to even talk about a number which would not work
in that context. And, that's dangerous ground for mathematical
discussion.

Anyways... in my opinion, this is definitely a "don't overthink it"
topic. (What some people might carelessly call "a waste of time").

Thanks,

-- 
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to