C =: 2 : 0
1 : ((": m) , ' u~ ' , ": m V n)
)
On Thursday, February 27, 2020, 03:04:57 a.m. EST, Hauke Rehr
<hauke.r...@uni-jena.de> wrote:
What I want is rather something (C here) callable like
noun1 C noun2
resulting in the adverb
noun1 u~ <result of noun1 V noun2>
What you say I knew except if the evaluation
rules changed in j9 and this is new bahaviour.
That said, I got rid of my nested 1 :/2 :
construct (I didn’t mention that yet)
and tried replacing m and n by x and y
but to no avail.
Am 27.02.20 um 01:37 schrieb 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming:
> u or m will be the argument to A. x and y arguments to resulting verb.
>
> it sounds as though you may be trying to do
>
> A =: 1 : 'x u~ x V y' NB. a valid dyadic adverb in j9
>
> and this would be equivalent to
>
> ([ u~ V)
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 26, 2020, 06:20:45 p.m. EST, Hauke Rehr
> <hauke.r...@uni-jena.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello again,
>
> I’m still confused about modifiers.
> Please tell me where to find more information
> that might aid in understanding how this works:
>
> I have an adverb A and a verb V but sometimes
> x and y for the derived verb for A are known
> prior to the verb, so I want to write a modifier
> something like this:
>
> m (u A)~ m V n
>
> I get a domain error which afaik is due to both
> m and u being bound to the left noun.
> So how would one go about this and where to find
> further information on constructions like this?
>
--
----------------------
mail written using NEO
neo-layout.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
