C =: 2 : 0 1 : ((": m) , ' u~ ' , ": m V n) )
On Thursday, February 27, 2020, 03:04:57 a.m. EST, Hauke Rehr <hauke.r...@uni-jena.de> wrote: What I want is rather something (C here) callable like noun1 C noun2 resulting in the adverb noun1 u~ <result of noun1 V noun2> What you say I knew except if the evaluation rules changed in j9 and this is new bahaviour. That said, I got rid of my nested 1 :/2 : construct (I didn’t mention that yet) and tried replacing m and n by x and y but to no avail. Am 27.02.20 um 01:37 schrieb 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming: > u or m will be the argument to A. x and y arguments to resulting verb. > > it sounds as though you may be trying to do > > A =: 1 : 'x u~ x V y' NB. a valid dyadic adverb in j9 > > and this would be equivalent to > > ([ u~ V) > > > > > On Wednesday, February 26, 2020, 06:20:45 p.m. EST, Hauke Rehr > <hauke.r...@uni-jena.de> wrote: > > > > > > Hello again, > > I’m still confused about modifiers. > Please tell me where to find more information > that might aid in understanding how this works: > > I have an adverb A and a verb V but sometimes > x and y for the derived verb for A are known > prior to the verb, so I want to write a modifier > something like this: > > m (u A)~ m V n > > I get a domain error which afaik is due to both > m and u being bound to the left noun. > So how would one go about this and where to find > further information on constructions like this? > -- ---------------------- mail written using NEO neo-layout.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm