If we're going to go with obscure large numbers, beware of approaches like this:
".a.{~35+91#.inv".0 :0-.LF
81366029708523506035417756025037363272973280294647519604819263685640017
9642651075981229729337131561389540136499289281946214193588723081692514x
)
--
Raul
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 7:00 PM Jose Mario Quintana
<jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Beware of line wrapping...
>
> ".@:(a. {~ 10&#.;._1@:(11&#.^:_1))
> 30739697976703588591244373345865196746235510149791341765012434536582308002663839710172841101046239815523452535869272726506016785662661338257141163272141710507001629230146366047617876102522153544695636174631967362229178403155841399502650684104006983117091640130907323548394403671339602041172989310233598505787760228577057656577148445759247685290831860582478695956885021455311867524191800813255657241837731699976739168x
> ┌────┬───────┬─┬──────┐
> │just│another│j│hacker│
> └────┴───────┴─┴──────┘
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 3:35 AM Hauke Rehr <hauke.r...@uni-jena.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > some time ago I wrote three lines in reference to
> > the Perlish JAPH meme; I’ve been unsatisfied with
> > the approach taken so I never made it part of my
> > email signature.
> >
> > Here it is:
> >
> > 'e t' =: '0$0';' 5@>? ,9:?30= 5 3,.60='
> > v =: (+/ - *:@{:) ,".@(']&'&,)@,&e;._1 t
> > <@(v&+&.(a.&i.));._1 t
> >
> > Does any of you have a jajh of your own
> > or interest in making up one?
> > I’d be glad to see – and learn from – different
> > approaches to this fun task.
> >
> > --
> > ----------------------
> > mail written using NEO
> > neo-layout.org
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
