Yes indeed, the implementation here uses curl to pull down a jforum page and execute a sentence inside of it.
If your system uses wget instead, that won't work. I could have made it more robust, using a longer expression, but that was sort of not the point. Take care, -- Raul On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 5:25 PM Jose Mario Quintana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If we're going to go with obscure large numbers, > > Well, the point of providing an argument a couple of hundred orders of > magnitude higher than necessary to the Turing tar-pit was to emphasize that > one could easily obfuscate its code indefinitely. Was it not? > > > ".a.{~35+91#.inv".0 :0-.LF > > 81366029708523506035417756025037363272973280294647519604819263 > > ... > > ) > > I just get an error when I try your version, never mind. > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:22 PM Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > If we're going to go with obscure large numbers, beware of > > ... > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
