> If we're going to go with obscure large numbers,
Well, the point of providing an argument a couple of hundred orders of
magnitude higher than necessary to the Turing tar-pit was to emphasize that
one could easily obfuscate its code indefinitely. Was it not?
> ".a.{~35+91#.inv".0 :0-.LF
> 81366029708523506035417756025037363272973280294647519604819263
> ...
> )
I just get an error when I try your version, never mind.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:22 PM Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If we're going to go with obscure large numbers, beware of
> ...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
