Greg,
the 'vision' would be to be able to not only create J code that runs in the
browser, but one that has full DOM, Canvas, WebGL capability etc. For the
web assembly version I don't think that the current set of "!" features
need all be present especially if the JS interface was fluid enough and
powerful enough.

I am def. going to start looking into this as a retirement project. I
should be so lucky...



On Sun, 29 Nov 2020 at 16:48, greg heil <[email protected]> wrote:

> >>no, favoring emacs over vi is the most insane thought
>
> >Now, now no editor wars on Jprograming. Personally i prefer QED ... but i
> have not seen an implementation since QUED. Maybe Joey can update us... in
> JCHAT!
>
> >As to a web assembly version... a great idea! Especially if one can bring
> the full capabilities of the native Javascript through. It should be
> maintained by
> jsoftware.com alongside of their releases for the likes of Android, Pi etc
>
> >Joe Bogner has a great sifting to Javascript with Emscriptem and said he
> was interested in a WA version. Hopefully he can chime in with updates.
>
> ~greg
> https://picsrp.github.io
>
> --
>
> from: Hauke Rehr <[email protected]>
> to: [email protected]
> date: Nov 29, 2020, 5:16 AM
> subject: Re: [Jprogramming] J and Web Assembly
>
> >no, favoring emacs over vi is the most insane thought
>
> --
>
> from: emacstheviking <[email protected]>
> to: [email protected]
> date: Nov 29, 2020, 3:56 AM
> subject: [Jprogramming] J and Web Assembly
> mailing list: Programming forum
>
>
> >Anybody even tried this?
>
> >I have spent an hour reading the web assembly docs and I don't see why it
> couldn't be done apart from the !: commands which could be problematic.
>
> >I'm seeing a 'core' of the J language that provides basic language
> capability and then uses the WA interface to providea JS way to call JInit
> and JDo.
>
> >Mad idea?
>
> >I am def. going to investigate more over the coming weeks. I have a
> custom build of J on my iMac but I think it used gcc rather than clang
> which is what's required by the LLVM translation process.
>
> >This could be my most insane thought this weekend....
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to