Yes, I ended up indexing brackets with    I. '()' =/ y ,  assuming that the left & right brackets
were balanced!

Part 2 was long-winded, recursive,  but evaluated quickly, luckily.

My slowest routine for any of these posers is for part 2 of Day 15; best I managed was
~ 40 seconds.

Cheers,

Mike

On 18/12/2020 19:50, Joseph Novakovich wrote:
For part 1 I used pretty much the same approach, eval by way of
reversing (|.&.;:):

    +/ {{".'('c}')'o}y['o c'=. I. 0 1=/'()'i.y=.|.&.;:y}}&> in

Mine differs mostly in avoiding library definitions, amending parens
by index. For part 2 I used ;: to calculate a depth vector for the
tokens and then I evaluate the deepest nested subexpressions at each
iteration reaching fixpoint.

https://github.com/jitwit/aoc/blob/a/J/20/18.ijs

On 12/18/20, 'Michael Day' via Programming <programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
Unlike in the K forum,  the J-wires have been virtually silent on this
year's Advent of Code...

Anyway,  today's problem,  number 18,  might interest J & APLers as part
1 is ALMOST
plug-it-in to J/APL;  there's just one twist,  so to speak,  namely we
need to reverse an
arithmetic expression,  eg
     1 + (2 * 3) + (4 * (5 + 6))
needs to be evaluated as
     ((6 + 5) * 4) + (3 * 2) + 1

But, even though all numbers are single-digit,  just reversing the
string doesn't work,  fairly obviously:
     |.'1 + (2 * 3) + (4 * (5 + 6))'
))6 + 5( * 4( + )3 * 2( + 1

So the brackets need swapping.  The data is supplied as strings,  so I
expected to use stringreplace,
as found in strings.ijs

But:
     |.    (  ')[' , '()' , '[('  ) stringreplace '1 + (2 * 3) + (4 * (5
+ 6))'
[[6 + 5) * 4) + [3 * 2) + 1

Why don't the intermediate '[' get changed to the final ')'  ?

The second action in stringreplace is on the left hand argument:
     _2 [\ ,(')[' , '()' , '[(' )
)[
()
[(

The first column should be items of old text and the second column
their new replacements.  But the third pair seems to be ignored.

I did of course get round this little difficulty,  but would have preferred
not to reinvent the wheel.

NB. Part 2 is a little more challenging,  as + is defined there as taking
precedence over * .

Thanks,

Mike

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm


--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to