Hello Roger;
Why not:
,i.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|\/| Randy A MacDonald | APL: If you can say it, it's done.. (ram)
|/\| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|\ | |If you cannot describe what you are doing
BSc(Math) UNBF'83 þas a process, you don't know what you're doing.
Sapere Aude | - W. E. Deming
Natural Born APL'er | Demo website: http://156.34.95.92/
-----------------------------------------------------(INTP)----{ gnat }-
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Hui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Programming forum" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Explicit-to-tacit query
13 : n uses a set of heuristics to do its work.
Sometimes you can do better than what it does.
If I were translating (,x) i. y I would have
written ,@[ i. ] .
----- Original Message -----
From: Fred Bone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, July 14, 2006 3:37 am
Subject: [Jprogramming] Explicit-to-tacit query
I frequently use 13 : to explore different ways to express an idea.
Here's one I just tried, as part of something else:
13 : '(,x) i. y'
] i.~ [: , [
This does not seem any simpler to me. What is the benefit of
recasting
the expression like this? Does it optimise better at run-time? Is
"13 :"
trying to minimise the parens at all costs? If so, why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
