Hi, Bill.
Thanks a lot. It is perfect.
I have already tried '_bar', but not 'bar_'. 'bar_' works properly.
Thanks again.
Best regards.
Toshinari Kamakura
On 2007/04/11, at 15:08, bill lam wrote:
On 2007/04/11, at 15:02, bill lam wrote:
cder gave 2 0 meaning that the symbol cannot be found inside the
bar.so, most probably the fortran compiler mangled the function
name 'bar' to '_bar' or 'bar_', consult your compiler's
documentation for exact the name mangling scheme. J itself knows
nothing about name mangling.
BTW 0+>:i.10 or even 0.0+>:i.10 cannot coerce integers to doubles,
but (0.5-0.5)+>:i.10 is ok, there are other variations too.
try
'/Users/kamakura/work/corf/bar.so _bar n *i *d'& cd (;~ ,@#) }:
0.5,~ >:i.10
or
'/Users/kamakura/work/corf/bar.so bar_ n *i *d'& cd (,@# ; ]) }:
0.5,~ >:i.10
In linux or mac, there is only one calling convection so that the
'+' after the function name is not required or recommended.
--
regards,
bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
