> For example, at the first Hoboken JUG, Roger > mentioned that he had found a "bug" in the Dictionary. > Here's the problematic sentence: > > (f g h) y <==> (f y) g (h y)
Good Lord, this isn't a 'bug' to be cast aside, it's a description of function, and one that I have counted on for years. A change of this magnitude should certainly make it to the Release Notes. Did I miss it? If what you say is true, I have to revisit a large section of my code to see what the ramifications are. Ay-yi-yi, this is a headache. Can I at least beg for advance wsrning if the interpreter is ever actually changed to execute the fork in other than right-to-left order? Henry Rich ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
