On Dec 18, 2007 10:12 AM, Don Guinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am a little concerned about the practice of using @: as a performance > improvement over @ . To me @: is a way for me to tell the interpreter that I > do not want parallel execution. And using @ means I will allow parallel > execution if it ever exists.
In cases where these are equivalent, your underlying primitive should still grant you any potential parallelism. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
