I was thinking about defined verbs. On Dec 18, 2007 8:17 AM, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007 10:12 AM, Don Guinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am a little concerned about the practice of using @: as a performance > > improvement over @ . To me @: is a way for me to tell the interpreter > that I > > do not want parallel execution. And using @ means I will allow parallel > > execution if it ever exists. > > In cases where these are equivalent, your underlying primitive should > still grant you any potential parallelism. > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
