Does it make sense to define obverses of tacit verbs to be used with &. and 
^:_1 ?

If so, what is the tacit definition equivalent to:

ctof =: monad : '((9%5)*y)+32' :. ftoc
and
ftoc =: monad : '(5%9)*(y-32)' :. ctof

such that:
ftoc(ftoc^:_1)212
yields 212
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to