Mark Rosenthal-2 wrote:
>
> Does it make sense to define obverses of tacit verbs to be used with &.
> and ^:_1 ?
>
> If so, what is the tacit definition equivalent to:
>
> ctof =: monad : '((9%5)*y)+32' :. ftoc
> and
> ftoc =: monad : '(5%9)*(y-32)' :. ctof
>
> such that:
> ftoc(ftoc^:_1)212
> yields 212
>
ctof=: 32+(9%5)*]
ctof(ctof^:_1)212
212
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tacit-obverse--tp25088303s24193p25088401.html
Sent from the J Programming mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
