Ah! So is the obverse of a tacit definition always implied?... Can J always figure it out from the original definition?
Thanks! -----Original Message----- >From: Raul Miller <[email protected]> >Sent: Aug 21, 2009 7:14 PM >To: Programming forum <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Tacit obverse? > >On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Mark Rosenthal<[email protected]> wrote: >> ... what is the tacit definition equivalent to: >> >> ctof =: monad : '((9%5)*y)+32' :. ftoc >> and >> ftoc =: monad : '(5%9)*(y-32)' :. ctof > >tacit=: 13 >ctof=: tacit :'((9%5)*y)+32' >ftoc=: tacit :'(5%9)*(y-32)' > >-- >Raul >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
