Kip Murray <[email protected]> writes:

> It has to do with how the conjunction . seizes its right argument.

Kip,

I wondered about that, but it didn't make much sense to me in light of
the dictionary quotation.  With Dan's help, I now see it as related
because the . is part of an explicitly composed verb, not a train.

Thanks,

Bill
-- 
Bill Harris                      http://facilitatedsystems.com/weblog/
Facilitated Systems                              Everett, WA 98208 USA
http://facilitatedsystems.com/                  phone: +1 425 374-1845
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to