Yes, I was thinking I needed a key adverb that returns both the groupings and the value that each group is based upon so that that value can be used in an agenda.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Brian Schott <[email protected]>wrote: > >> So how do I group the similar y data values so that >> I can operate the same way within the groups, but >> differently on different groups, when I don't know how to >> construct the group until I have examined each group's y >> value's relation to its x value, first? >> >> > This sounds like different verbs for different groups. > > Perhaps you need a gerund x, with your original x and > your original y combined to form your actual y argument > at the level where you pass your gerund argument? > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- (B=) <-----my sig Brian Schott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
