That's more satisfying (at least for me) :-) Hallo Henry Rich, je schreef op 02-02-10 20:00: > $...@0: > > ? > > Henry Rich > > Aai wrote: > >> Just guessing: >> >> ea2=. +/@]`(*/@])`(>./@])`((i.0)"_)@. >> >> ;,/&.> a (~...@ea1 ([ ea2"_1 each) ea0) b >> 52 38 30 19 >> >> BTW >> >> Is there a better one for? >> (i.0)"_ >> >> >> Hallo Brian Schott, je schreef op 02-02-10 17:18: >> >>> Yes, that is better still. >>> Thank you. >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:58 AM, R.E. Boss <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> This can be simplified to >>>> >>>> a(([: ~. ea1) (<@[ ea2"0 2 each) ea0) b >>>> +-----------+----------+-----+ >>>> |24 29 35 32|14 19 0 17|0 0 0| >>>> +-----------+----------+-----+ >>>> >>>> >>>> R.E. Boss >>>> >>>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>> >>> >>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >
-- Met vriendelijke groet, =@@i ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
