>>>>>>>>>>>>>
More generally, these are equivalent (with nouns m and n, verbs u and v)
 m (u v) n
 m ([ u v@]) n
 m u (v n)
 m u v n
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

but if u an v are both dyadic, as I think ; and,: are, it ought to be m u (m
v n) shouldn't it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to