When J execute these sentence, the valency is determined by neither u nor v, but by the context. Specfically for a hook (u v), u is always dyad while v is always monad, If u does not provide a defintion for dyad part or v cap the monad part, it will raise an error.
Птн, 25 Мар 2011, Adrian May писал(а): > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > More generally, these are equivalent (with nouns m and n, verbs u and v) > m (u v) n > m ([ u v@]) n > m u (v n) > m u v n > <<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > but if u an v are both dyadic, as I think ; and,: are, it ought to be m u (m > v n) shouldn't it? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
