OK, but suppose what you really wanted was This user has 05 credits left from a starting total of 097
Henry Rich On 11/1/2011 9:51 PM, Ric Sherlock wrote: > I would've turned to: > 'r<0>2.0' (8!:0) 5 > ┌──┐ > │05│ > └──┘ > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Raul Miller<[email protected]> wrote: >> Personally, I'd probably use }.":100+5 for that >> >> -- >> Raul >> >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Andrew Pennebaker >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'd like to make a distinction between width and precision. From what I >>> gather in the interpreter, %2.2d prints "5.00", but what I want is "05". >>> That's what happens with fmt, anyway. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Andrew Pennebaker >>> www.yellosoft.us >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Henry Rich<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'll try to fix that long-standing deficiency when I port to 7.01. In >>>> the meantime, use %2.2d (it does support width, just not the 0 flag). >>>> >>>> Henry Rich >>>> >>>> On 11/1/2011 5:20 PM, Andrew Pennebaker wrote: >>>>> I'd also like to see width specifiers in printf/sprintf, a la C. That >>>> would >>>>> let printf do "%02d", i.e. zero-pad an integer until it fills two >>>>> characters. I know it's not critical, but I'd like to see a more complete >>>>> interface for these functions. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Andrew Pennebaker >>>>> www.yellosoft.us >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:56 PM, David Mitchell<[email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You would have to put printf.ijs there yourself. As you found, it is >>>> not >>>>>> installed there in J7. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would suggest temporarily copying it yourself from the J6 directory >>>> to a >>>>>> J7 >>>>>> directory, perhaps your J7 user directory. >>>>>> >>>>>> As I recall the beta test and release schedule of J7, the reasons for >>>> the >>>>>> release of a 'unfinished' J7 were several: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) The support philosophy of J7 was radically different than prior J >>>>>> versions, >>>>>> in my opinion. J7 is now essentially open source and depends on user >>>>>> contributions for future enhancements and even conversions of some of >>>> the >>>>>> previously 'standard' scripts. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2) The file structure of J7 was significantly different than J6. As far >>>>>> as I >>>>>> can see, the goal was to simplify the 'core' J as much as possible and >>>>>> move as >>>>>> many 'non-core' scripts as possible to the addons directories. >>>>>> >>>>>> 3) The elimination of the long time favorite 'wd' interface in J7 meant >>>>>> that >>>>>> many support scripts would have to be radically rewritten to work with >>>> J7. >>>>>> While printf does not use 'wd', printf may have gotten caught up in the >>>>>> general >>>>>> direction of J7 and left as an exercise for the user. >>>>>> >>>>>> See more discussion about this topic in the historical logs of the Beta >>>>>> Forum. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> -- >>>>>> David Mitchell >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/1/2011 13:23, Andrew Pennebaker wrote: >>>>>>> I ls'd the j64-701/system/main/ directory and found no printf.ijs file. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why would JSoftware release a new v7 version of J without first >>>> upgrading >>>>>>> the addons from v6? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andrew Pennebaker >>>>>>> www.yellosoft.us >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:54 AM, David Mitchell<[email protected] >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Andrew, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't have access to J on a Mac, so I cannot guarantee that the >>>>>> process >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> worked for me will work for you. But, I suspect that it will. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What I recommend is that you install both J6.02 and J7.01 on your Mac. >>>>>>>> There >>>>>>>> are elements of J6.02 that are not currently included in J7.01. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Some of the elements that are not included in J7.01 from J6.02 are >>>>>> mostly >>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>> wholly compatible with J7.01, but these elements have currently not >>>> been >>>>>>>> migrated to J7.01. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The printf script is one of those J6.02 elements that does not appear >>>> to >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>> been migrated to J7.01. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have both J6.02 and J7.01 installed on Windows 7_64. After I saw >>>> your >>>>>>>> question >>>>>>>> concerning printf, I looked in J6.02 using "Find in Files" and found >>>>>> that >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> printf verbs were defined in j602/system/main/printf.ijs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I looked at the definitions of the printf verbs to see if I could see >>>>>> any >>>>>>>> reason >>>>>>>> why they would not work on J7.01 or on a Mac. I did not see any >>>> obvious >>>>>>>> reason >>>>>>>> that they were likely to fail on J7.01 or a Mac. I also noticed that >>>>>> the >>>>>>>> printf.ijs script had a built-in test that validated many of the verbs >>>>>> and >>>>>>>> formats supported by printf.ijs. I ran the test on J7.01 and the test >>>>>>>> reported >>>>>>>> that all of the tests ran fine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Based on that result and my own casual testing of printf verbs, I >>>>>> believe >>>>>>>> that, >>>>>>>> if you install J6.02, you will likely be able to load printf.ijs from >>>>>> J6.02 >>>>>>>> while running J7.01 on your Mac and that will define the printf verbs >>>>>> and >>>>>>>> provide you the printf functionality. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At some point, some one may decide that the J6.02 printf.ijs script >>>>>> should >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>> included in J7.01. Because of the decision to move many of the J6.02 >>>>>>>> included >>>>>>>> .ijs scripts from the main J system directories to the addons >>>>>> directories, >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> will probably wind up in addons/format or addons/general/misc >>>> directory. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I must admit I had not bumped into Mitchell and Webb before. One of >>>>>> these >>>>>>>> days, >>>>>>>> I should start a web site (if it doesn't already exist) where all of >>>> us >>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>> Mitchell's could gather. Until the advent of the web, I had thought >>>>>> that >>>>>>>> I had >>>>>>>> a reasonably unique name. Since the web, I have discovered that there >>>>>> are >>>>>>>> hundreds, if not thousands of David Mitchell's just in NY State. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All the best, >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> David Mitchell >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10/31/2011 14:02, Andrew Pennebaker wrote: >>>>>>>>> David: Are you saying that J701 x64 for Mac currently supports printf >>>>>> by >>>>>>>>> default, or that printf must be compiled, or something else? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What's your opinion of Mitchell and Webb? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andrew Pennebaker >>>>>>>>> www.yellosoft.us >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:02 AM, David Mitchell< >>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The J6 version of printf (system/main/printf.ijs) seems to work fine >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> J7. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I enabled the built-in test cases and ran the printf tests on J7_64 >>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>> were no errors reported. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> NB. modify script to run tests. >>>>>>>>>> NB. Test lines (change ^:0 to ^:1 to run test) >>>>>>>>>> load 'c:/users/me/j602/system/main/printf.ijs' >>>>>>>>>> Error count: 0 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> All the best, >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> David Mitchell >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 10/31/2011 1:32, Andrew Pennebaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> $ jconsole >>>>>>>>>>> load 'printf' >>>>>>>>>>> not found: /Users/andrew/Desktop/printf >>>>>>>>>>> |file name error: script >>>>>>>>>>> | 0!:0 y[4!:55<'y' >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Specs: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - J701 x64 >>>>>>>>>>> - Mac OS X Lion 10.7.2 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Andrew Pennebaker >>>>>>>>>>> www.yellosoft.us >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> For information about J forums see >>>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> For information about J forums see >>>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> For information about J forums see >>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> For information about J forums see >>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
